We illustrate the following example from two-component regular solutions
but the concepts certainly apply to more components and more sophisticated
solution models. Although two components allows us to define a single
composition , the comparisons are abetted by our introduction of a vector
notation.
For a regular solution model ,
where
is a reduced temperature which scales out the energy of mixing and
Boltzmann's constant. Letting
, the molar
free energy becomes
In Figure 1, these molar free energies are plotted
in the left column of the figure at reduced temperatures above, just below
and
well below
the critical temperature.
The common tangent construction at each temperature was used to draw
the
phase diagram in the middle.
The dashed curve in the phase diagram correspond to the spinodals, where
.
Chemical potentials for both components can be obtained for this model by any
one of a number of equivalent ways, e.g. by taking the derivatives of with respect to
and
. Another is taking the intercepts at
and
of tangents at
to
. The resulting chemical
potentials are plotted against each other in the figures of the right column
of
Figure 1. Since the coordinates of any point of this curve
give the values of the two chemical potentials, these point are the ends of
is the gradient of
. We wish to focus on this
-shape.
At high this shape is smoothly curved. Because of the geometric
relation
in Equation 3 i.e., the Gibbs-Duhem equation in the case of
solution
thermodynamics,
, the
normal to the
curve is the composition vector
. Thus we can
know the composition for each part of the curve. Once that is known we can
recover
from this curve from
, but there are
other ways.
Below the critical temperature the -plot becomes self-intersecting
and
develops `swallow-tails' or `ears.' The crossings are places
where two phases (smooth curves) have the
same chemical potential. Because of the Gibbs-Duhem equation relating slope to
composition, the distinct compositions of each of the phases
are given by the normals to the curve at the crossing point. The
sharpness the corner at the crossing relates to the difference in composition
between the two phases in equilibrium, i.e.,
the width of the miscibility gap in the phase diagram.
This analogy between corners in
-shapes and phase diagrams extends to
multicomponent phase equilibrium.
The locally convex portions of the ears represent metastable compositions;
the
concave parts unstable compositions. The metastable and unstable part are
separated by a spinode. Eliminating the ears produces a convex figure that
is
the convexified -shape. It contains all the information that was in
the convexified
plus a graphic display of all the phase equilibria.
This diagram illustrates the geometric nature of Equation 3.
The diagrams on the left and right side of Figure 1
are dual
to each other.
Each can be used to calculate the phase diagram in the center and any
diagram
on the right side () can be used to calculate its dual
-shape
which appears on the right side of Figure 1.
Note that even though the phase diagram cannot be used to determine
any of the other figures uniquely, the special CALPHAD procedures have
had
considerable successes.[6][53]